Sara Bearden
Water Potential & Molarity Mix up Argumentation
The color that has a molarity of 0.0M is dark green, light green is 0.2M, blue is 0.4M, orange is 0.6M, red is 0.8M, and yellow is 1.0M. Figuring out the molarity of each colored was based off both of the data collected from the first activity and the second activity due to the fact that the light green was done twice in the first part which, led to different results than expected. Also the vegetables give a more realistic reading about the solutions since the vegetables have real cell membrane where the dialysis tubing is just a representation of a cell membrane. From the second activity the dark green showed to have the greatest percent change in mass with a 28.7% change in the turnip and a 25% change in the artichoke. That means that there was a low concentration of water in both vegetables and a higher concentration in the dark green solution so by osmosis the water flowed into the vegetable which, increases the weight. This also made the piece softer since water was absorbed into the vegetable. Since, it was the softest that means the most water flowed into it and also with a greater change in the weights the dark green solution is 0.0M. The light green solution also had a bigger change in the masses of both vegetables as well and also one of the smallest changes in mass for the dialysis tubing. There was a 5.2g difference in the mass for the dialysis tubing, a 1.1g difference in the turnip, and a 0.2g difference in the artichoke mass at the end of the experiment. All mass differences were positive which, means that the weight increased which, means more water flowed in into the cell. Since, more water flowed in there was a low concentration of water in the vegetables but, for the dialysis tubing water would have flowed out first then in due to the fact it had more solution than water in it than the pure water. The random motion of the water by osmosis may have resulted in the increase of the mass to be high but, the results were lower than the other colors for the dialysis tubing. Therefore, light green has a molarity of 0.2M. The blue had very similar percent changes in mass in both vegetables with a 11.5% for turnip and 11.1% for artichoke but, for the dialysis tubing there was a 27.2% change. This is due to the water flowing into the cells by osmosis since there is a low concentration there since it's hypertonic. The dialysis tubing was the data that helped with figuring this one out because the vegetables had similar results so seeing that bigger change in the mass and feeling the tubing and noticing it was a little firm helped conclude that blue was 0.4M. While the plants were in the orange solution their masses didn’t change as much but, they were still positive with a 0.1g increase in the turnip and in the artichoke. This would be a result due to the plants having a slightly smaller concentration of water than the orange solution so the water flowed in them but, not as much during their random movement. But, for the dialysis tubing the orange cell had a 11.1g increase and felt firm which, indicates it was a hypertonic solution so, water flowed in due to the low concentration and filling the cell. Therefore, making the orange solution be 0.6M. Red was one of the more hypertonic solutions because it was the first one to show a negative percent change in mass in the turnip which was -9.8% but, the artichoke still had a positive percent change of 11.1%. That could be from the vegetables having different water concentrations where the turnip has more. With a negative change that means the solution the turnip was in had less water than the turnip and that the water flowed to the solution due to the low concentration there and showing how the red is 0.8M. Lastly for the yellow the dialysis tubing in the end was very firm and it had the greatest increase in mass with a 14.4g increase. Also there was a decrease in the mass in the vegetable in the end with a 1.0g decrease for the turnip and a 0.2g decrease for the artichoke. What that means is that there was more solutes in the dialysis tubing than in the water so the water flowed into the bag and for the vegetables there was more water in them than the solution itself so the water flowed from the vegetable into the solution but osmosis. This is due to the low concentration of water in the solution and a high concentration in the vegetables. The tubing had the lowest concentration of water which, is why more water ended up flowing into it through its random movement and this causes for orange to have the highest molarity which was 1.0M.
The water potential of the turnip is -21.2 and the water potential for the artichoke is -15.0. The solute potential had to be calculated first and in order to get the concentration the point at which, the line of the graph crossed the x-axis line was used. The graph was made based the percent change of the pieces and the molarity of the colors they were in. The graph shows that the point would be about 0.86M for the turnip and 0.61 for the artichoke. By picking this point the vegetable would be at equilibrium with the solution so that means there is an equal amount of water in both from the random movement of the water over time. The temperature of the solutions was measured to be 23 degrees Celsius and when converted to Kelvin it was 296. After calculations the solute potential for the turnip was -21.2 and for the artichoke it was -15.0. The pressure potential is 0 because when using the point at which the line crosses the x-axis in the graph is where the cell would be at equilibrium. When the cell is at equilibrium there is no pressure being exerted on the cell wall or any shrinkage of the membrane away from the cell wall. So, when adding 0 to both numbers you get the same result for the solute potential as for the water potential. The green is the artichoke and the black is the turnip. |
Argument 1 - Some grammatical issues. "This also made the piece softer" contradicts the swelling of the cells in a hypotonic solution. This confusion regarding change in turgor pressure and the osmolarity of the cells vs. the solutions appeared again later in the argument. Inappropriate use of mass change rather than % change in mass for dialysis tubing bags. Argument was overall not as clearly articulated as it needed to be. Score - 40/50
ReplyDeleteArgument 2 - Units on water potential? Rationale for making graph not clearly explained. Graph itself is difficult to see. Formulas for solute potential and water potential not explained; neither is the value of i. Score - 42/50
Avg score = 41/50