Chigozie Amonu
Mr. Hammer
AP Biology
21 November 2014
Water
Potential & Molarity Mixup
Argument One
For
this lab, my lab group and I had to determine the unknown molarities of the six
unlabeled solutions. The molarities of each different colored solution could be
0.0M, 0.2M, 0.4M, 0.6M, 0.8M, or 1.0M. After the conduction of experiments and
compilation and analysis of data from Activity One and Two, we determined that
the order of molarity of the solutions, from least to greatest (0.0M to 1.0M),
was orange, dark green, light green, blue, yellow, and red. To get these
results, two separate experiments were done. One was done with dialysis tubing
bags, and the other was done using two vegetables, squash and parsnip. My lab
group and I analyzed all of the data that we got from both experiments. We
eventually decided to use the data from the experiments done with squash and
parsnip because these two results proved this claim while the data from the
dialysis tubing did not. Simply, the majority of our evidence supported this
claim.
For
the vegetable experiment, my lab group and I cut six pieces from each vegetable
and weighed each piece. We then measured out 75 mL of solution to put the
vegetables in. The six pieces of each vegetable were put into the six different
solutions, and the cup and beakers that they were in were covered with foil and
left to sit overnight. The next day in class, my lab group and I weighed the
vegetables and recorded the weight in data tables. The percent change for each
piece of vegetable was calculated (percent change= [final mass minus initial
mass] divided by [initial mass] times 100). For the parsnip, the percent
changes were -25.32% for red, 47.62% for orange, -20.96% for yellow, 10.64% for
light green, 32.09% for dark green, and -13.24% for blue. For the squash, the
percent changes were -45.68% for red, -6.94% for orange, -43.04% for yellow,
-4.55% for light green, 20.37% for dark green, and -31.43% for blue.
Parsnip Data
Color of Solution in Which Parsnip
was Placed
|
Initial Weight of Parsnip
|
Weight of Parsnip After Overnight
Stay
|
Percent Change
|
Red
|
15.8 g
|
11.8 g
|
-25.32%
|
Orange
|
12.6 g
|
13.2 g
|
47.62%
|
Yellow
|
16.7 g
|
13.2 g
|
-20.96%
|
Light Green
|
14.1 g
|
15.6 g
|
10.64%
|
Dark Green
|
13.4 g
|
17.7 g
|
32.09%
|
Blue
|
13.6 g
|
11.8 g
|
-13.24%
|
Squash Data
Color of Solution in Which Squash
was Placed
|
Initial Weight of Squash
|
Weight of Squash After Overnight
Stay
|
Percent Change
|
Red
|
8.1 g
|
4.4 g
|
-45.68%
|
Orange
|
7.2 g
|
6.7 g
|
-6.94%
|
Yellow
|
7.9 g
|
4.5 g
|
-43.04%
|
Light Green
|
8.8 g
|
8.4 g
|
-4.55%
|
Dark Green
|
5.4 g
|
6.5 g
|
20.37%
|
Blue
|
7.0 g
|
4.8 g
|
-31.43%
|
We
determined that a negative percent change indicated the shrinking of the cell.
This would mean that the cell was in a hypertonic solution that had a high
concentration of water in the cell and a low concentration of water outside of
the cell. The water would move across the concentration gradient from high
concentration to low concentration through osmosis, a type of diffusion. This
information led us to believe that the most negative percent change of the vegetable
equaled the highest molarity of the solution in which it is placed since there
would be less water and more solute, in this case sucrose, outside of the cell
(in the solution). On the other hand, a positive percent change would indicate
the swelling of a cell. This would mean that the cell was in a hypotonic
solution that had a low concentration of water in the cell and a high
concentration of water outside of the cell. The water would move into the cell
through osmosis, causing it to swell, and proving that there was a less solute
concentration and higher water concentration in the solution. The most positive
percent change in the vegetable equaled the lowest molarity of the solution in
which the vegetable is placed.
My
lab group and I then arranged these percent changes from greatest to least. For
the parsnip, the order was orange, dark green, light green, blue, yellow, and
red. For the squash, the order was dark green, light green, orange, blue,
yellow, and red. We compared these orders and found that the blue, red, and
yellow were 0.6M, 0.8M, and 1.0M, respectively, for each vegetable. The dark
green, light green, and orange were in different orders on each greatest to
least list. For the squash, the order was dark green, light green, orange. For
the parsnip, the order was orange, dark green, light green. We decided to use
the parsnip order because it seemed more logical to move one color (orange) to
the top since the dark and light green were ordered consecutively on each list
and would move up and down the final list as one entity. After analyzing all of
our data, we concluded* that the order of molarities is orange (0.0 M), dark
green (0.2M), light green (0.4M), blue (0.6M), yellow (0.8M), and red (1.0M).
As
I mentioned before, we did not use the data from the dialysis tubing to support
our claim. There was more room for error in this experiment. The bags of
solution may not have been properly tied and could have leaked, causing a
discrepancy in the dialysis tubing bag’s final mass. Also, we did not use the
same scale to weigh the bags on the second day of the lab. We also concluded to
not use the data from this experiment because the evidence did not support our
claim. The percent changes were -6.25% for red, 19.94% for orange, 9.94% for
yellow, 0.97% for light green, 0.68% for dark green, and 30.37% for blue. For
this experiment, a more negative percent change would represent the shrinking
of the cell, and therefore a hypertonic solution and a lower molarity. A more
positive percent change would represent the swelling of the cell and therefore
a hypotonic solution and a higher molarity. Based on this information, the
order of molarity of the solutions would be red (0.0M), dark green (0.2M),
light green (0.4M), yellow (0.6M), orange (0.8M), and blue (1.0M). All in all,
this data did not support our original claim, and we determined the squash and
parsnip experiment to be more accurate.
Dialysis Tubing Data
Color of Solution in Bag
|
Initial Weight of
a Bag |
Weight After One Day
|
Percent Change
|
Red
|
32.0 g
|
30.0 g
|
-6.25%
|
Orange
|
32.1 g
|
38.5 g
|
19.94%
|
Yellow
|
34.2 g
|
37.6 g
|
9.94%
|
Light Green
|
30.9 g
|
31.2 g
|
0.97%
|
Dark Green
|
29.5 g
|
29.7 g
|
0.68%
|
Blue
|
32.6 g
|
42.5 g
|
30.37%
|
Argument Two
The water potential for parsnip is -12.29 bars, and the
water potential for squash is -3.69 bars. To find this, my lab group and I had
to first determine the solute and pressure potential. To calculate the solute
potential, we used the formula Ѱs= -iCRT (solute potential equals the number of
particles the molecule will make in water times molar concentration times
pressure constant times temperature in degrees Kelvin). We had to find C, the
molar concentration. To do this, we had to graph the percent changes of each
vegetable from Activity Two (squash and parsnip) compared to the molarity of
each solution. The x-axis is molarity, and the y-axis is percent change. The
molar concentration ended up being where the graph of the percent changes hit
the x-axis. These molar concentrations were 0.5M for the parsnip and 0.15M for
the squash. We used room temperature (23ºC) as the temperature for the solute
potential and converted it to Kelvin (273+23ºC). We then plugged these values
into Ѱs= -iCRT. The equation for parsnip was –(1)(0.5)(0.0831)(296) and it
equaled -12.29 bars, the solute potential. The equation for squash was
–(1)(0.15)(0.0831)(296) and it equaled -3.69 bars, the solute potential. We
then determined that the pressure potential was zero, and used the equation Ѱ= Ѱs+Ѱp
(water potential= solute potential plus pressure potential) to calculate the
water potential. The equation for parsnip would be Ѱ= -12.29+0, and would equal
-12.29 bars, the water potential. The equation for squash would be Ѱ= -3.69+0,
and would equal -3.69 bars, the water potential. The squash has a higher water
potential than the parsnip. Because of this, water can move more freely in and
out of the squash cells during osmosis.
Title: Percent Changes of Parsnip in Comparison to Molarities of Solution; x-axis represents the molarity, and the y-axis represents the percent change |
Title: Percent Changes of Squash in Comparison to Molarities of Solution; x-axis represents the molarity, and the y-axis represents the percent change |
Argument 1 - Inaccurate calculate of % change in mass for orange (4.762% instead of 47.62%), leading to partially accurate claim. Data table titles do not follow guidelines for specificity. No graph included. Discussion of dialysis tubing data does not adequately explain why data was considered to be invalid (due to lab error). Score - 42/50
ReplyDeleteArgument 2 - Insufficient description of variables used on graphs. Insufficient explanation of why C was calculated based on x-intercepts. No explanation given for values of i and pressure potential. No units given in calculation. Final sentence does not reflect full understanding of water potential. Score - 38/50
Avg score = 40/50